Icy lab, LOL charts and Quantitative problems

       One of the main ideas that our class learned this week was the relationship between ice, water and gas. In order to investigate these relationships, we conducted an Icy Hot Lab. For this lab, we filled a beaker with ice and placed the beaker on a hot plate. Once measuring the temperature (-13.1°C), using a thermometer that was connected to lap quest; we turned on the hot plate and began observing. To make sure the temperature was evenly distributed, we mixed the ice around in a constant motion. We continued mixing and observing the change in matter. After a few minutes we noticed water beginning appear at the bottom of beaker at -4.3°C. We began observing this reaction until the ice turned completely into water (15.4°C) and later reached it’s boiling point (98.5°C). It was up to our class to hypothesize the resulting graph. With the y-axis being temperature and the x-axis being time, my table group and I predicted to the graph to more a positive curved graph:  This means as the time increased, so did the temperature. After discussing the multiple options, we realized that that curved relationship couldn’t work because we wouldn’t be able differentiate the changes in matter. This was our resulting graph: With various whiteboard discussions, our class learned that this graph shows the energy flow through heating during its series of changes. Two main types of energy that play into these transfers are thermal and change phase energy (Eth and Eph). During the inclines of temperature, thermal energy(Eth) is stored. During the plateaus, there is a change in the phase which stores phase energy(Eph). The particles reactions for this graph are pretty simple to comprehend. Here is a diagram that shows the particles movement throughout the energy flow process: From previous labs, we know that colders particles move slower (ice) and warmer particles move faster. Once the process is over, it would have gone through 3 stages(ice>water>gas). Each stage has a different need of energy flow to change one matter to another. Which leads into the second main idea for the week. 

Different matters need different rates of energy applied to it, in order to explore more with this idea, our class did a few LOL charts (Energy flow bar charts). Here is example of one of the charts that my group and I worked through: 

To properly show the flow in energy, a solid is presented as one block, a liquid is two blocks and a gas is four blocks. As the description states, a can of cold soda warms as it is left on a counter. The current phase is a liquid, and is cold. Once sitting on the counter for awhile, the soda is still a liquid so the two blocks stay on the chart. On the other hand, the cold soda did warm up. This means the thermal energy has increased. To show this increase We sketched half a block on the final thermal column. This results in a .5 energy flow increase. Beginning with the energy flow of 3.5 and resulting in 4.0, this means an increase in energy has taken place. We can show this change by putting an arrow towards the circle with half a block stretched behind it. 

Our last main idea for the week was quantitative energy problems. This idea incorporates the objective learned in the icy hot lab. Due to the rate of how much energy is needed to alter various types of matter, there is an energy constant for each one. The purpose for these problems is to be able to calculate the energy used or needed within a reaction. Here is an example of one of the problems our class handelled.To find the energy that was released, we used the equation Q=m(mass) • c(capacity) • the change in T. Once plugging in the accurate data, we solve. We can solve by first cancelling out all units of °Celsius . Keeping in mind that energy is measured in Joules, the product in this case is -32,000 J. 

As we continued this week, we mainly focused on quantitative problems, LOL charts and the significance of the icy hot label. Overall, my head wasn’t in this week's lesson compared to previous weapons. Although I enjoyed the LOL charts and the Icy Hot Lab, I found the quantitative problems to be a bit of a challenge. I felt kind of confused during the lesson and was not too confident about my understanding. I’m interested in doing more LOL charts, yet challenge myself with more quantitative word problems. My comprehension of the quantitative labs would be about a 4, whereas my understanding of the LOL labs are about an 8. Overall, I look forward to applying these concepts in the future and experimenting with them more.